I found this quote by someone I had not heard about before, and it struck something I had not given much thought about before. The idea of getting lost in a mystery, in the need to understand it without solving it has always been “something” important to me: a state in which I can entertain … Continue reading
We have not yet filled The Need for Accessible Language in Science and Philosophy. Though it is much better than about 5 years ago, the language of science is still heavy and difficult to follow. Continue reading
Brussel declaration on principles for science & policy making | Climate Etc. Continue reading
Originally posted on Why Evolution Is True:
Panpsychism has a long history in philosophy, and is defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as “the doctrine that mind is a fundamental feature of the world which exists throughout the universe.” In other words, everything has a mind, with some philosophers, like Philip Goff, claiming that objects like…
A bit of science humour for you on this Wednesday afternoon. Ha ha! I would try this.
This small change has generated an increase of 132% in general traffic. I will post the numbers once this new social media experiment is complete it. Continue reading
As I shared before, I have been enrolled in several philosophy courses these last couple of years. I have done this solely for the purpose of personal development; and it has helped me to understand the more abstract components of my own experience. It is worth noting at this time that, in the past, that is before I undertook the endeavour of studying philosophy as a discipline, I had little to no respect for the idea of it. The mere mention of its name caused contempt in me, and often disdain for those who leaned on it as a viable method for understanding anything at all. You see my view of philosophy was contaminated by the misuse (or popular equivocation) of the term, which like many other powerful and important words in our lexicon, is polysemic ; which in turn has to do more with the sense or the semantics of the word according to the context it is used in. This is all due to my own ignorance, of course, I should be a bit more immune to such logical fallacies and canards.
Polysemy (/pəˈlɪsᵻmi/ or /ˈpɒlᵻsiːmi/; from Greek: πολυ-, poly-, “many” and σῆμα, sêma, “sign”) is the capacity for a sign (such as a word, phrase, or symbol) to have multiple meanings (that is, multiple semes or sememes and thus multiple senses), usually related by contiguity of meaning within a semantic field.
In what we can see as everyday use the term can refer to someone’s [specific] worldview that while being subjective cannot be inspected properly outside of the experience of the individual holding it. After all, most of us have heard and tried to listen to Russel Brandt spewing nonsense and labeling it his “philosophy”. More upsetting than that (to me) was the willingness of his defendants to call it the same. And I maintain that this is one of the many instances when observing subjectivity too closely is more vicious than virtuous, because it gives people permission to exonerate certain ideas from critical examination.
It turns out that philosophy, as it relates to the worthwhile area of academic study; and points to the erudite thinkers of the past, is concerned with facts, and more importantly with challenging what these and all thinkers hold as true. Philosophy is about thinking about thinking, and further, worrying about how that thinking takes place. It is a metacognitive commitment to knowledge and the process of arriving at what we can securely refer to as knowledge.
My views on philosophy have changed, and so have many of my perspectives on the world and what I think I know about it. I am more sceptical than before, and more willing to scrutinise my perception in critical ways. I have found in philosophy the essence of humility and intellectual honesty. And after having paid for these courses what some would consider more than necessary, this acquisition of intellectual consistency is absolutely priceless.
This exercise consists of 5 steps that will help you start challenging and testing your ideas – your critical thinking skills. The video explains the process graphically. As it is suggested in the video, do take your time with your choices and thinking about them. Remember that intellectual honesty is essential to critical thinking and … Continue reading
Our new channel is up and ready. It helps a lot if you go watch and subscribe. Help us spread knowledge and appreciation of Science, Critical thinking and Philosophy. We do this in hopes of improving society by getting people to think better about all the decisions they make. As we have claimed before: this … Continue reading