This is the unjustified/unjustifiable nonsense that gives philosophy a bad name and makes us all look like fools. It isn’t enough to think about things, we must apply filters to that thinking and allow evidence to guide it.
Panpsychism has a long history in philosophy, and is defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as “the doctrine that mind is a fundamental feature of the world which exists throughout the universe.” In other words, everything has a mind, with some philosophers, like Philip Goff, claiming that objects like electrons and rocks have “an inner life”. . “feelings, sensations, and experiences.”
Goff, an associate professor of philosophy at Central European University in Budapest, puts forth his arguments for panpsychism in a new piece in Aeon magazine, “Panpsychism is crazy, but it’s also most probably true.” His arguments for panpsychism—the existence of mind in matter—has three prongs:
- We know nothing about the intrinsic nature of “inanimate” matter, so it could have mind.
- The assumption that matter has mind is more parsimonious than assuming it doesn’t, and that’s for the next reason:
- The “continuity argument” used by some philosophers. As Goff…
View original post 1,421 more words